FMCSA Issues New English Language Proficiency Guidance
Yesterday, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued internal agency enforcement guidance (Guidance) to evaluate the English language proficiency (ELP) requirement for driver qualification under 49 C.F.R. 391.11(b)(2). The ELP Guidance was issued pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 14286, Enforcing Commonsense Rules of the Road for America’s Truck Drivers, signed by President Trump on April 28. As directed by the EO, the Guidance rescinds and replaces prior policy guidance that the FMCSA issued in 2016.
The Guidance applies to all FMCSA enforcement personnel who perform inspections of motor carriers and drivers in the U.S. and directs them to conduct an assessment that consists of (1) a driver interview; and (2) a highway traffic sign recognition assessment, if the inspector determines the driver may not understand the inspector’s initial instructions. At the first Step, the driver interview should be conducted in English without the use of interpretation tools. If the driver is unable to respond sufficiently to English inquiries, FMCSA’s policy is to cite the driver for a violation of the ELP regulation and there is no need to go to Step 2. In Step 2, the inspector is to evaluate the driver’s ability to understand the meaning of U.S. highway traffic signs.
When the driver is cited for a violation, FMCSA’s policy includes placing the driver immediately out-of-service (starting June 25, when the regulation is incorporated in the North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria) and initiating additional action to disqualify the driver from operating commercial motor vehicles when warranted. The Guidance does not indicate how a driver can remedy or cure the condition. The policy of placing drivers out-of-service or further disqualifying the driver should not apply to drivers performing operations in the U.S.-Mexico border commercial zone, but the drivers may still be cited for violations.
The Guidance is redacted and therefore the criteria for the assessment in Step 1 is very vague. Unless the FMCSA issues additional instructions, this could lead to uneven enforcement throughout the U.S.
For more information, contact Greg Feary, Tim Wiseman, Prasad Sharma, or Chris Eckhart.
News from Scopelitis is intended as a report to our clients and friends on developments affecting the transportation industry. The published material does not constitute an exhaustive legal study and should not be regarded or relied upon as individual legal advice or opinion.
FMCSA Issues New English Language Proficiency Guidance
Yesterday, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued internal agency enforcement guidance (Guidance) to evaluate the English language proficiency (ELP) requirement for driver qualification under 49 C.F.R. 391.11(b)(2). The ELP Guidance was issued pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 14286, Enforcing Commonsense Rules of the Road for America’s Truck Drivers, signed by President Trump on April 28. As directed by the EO, the Guidance rescinds and replaces prior policy guidance that the FMCSA issued in 2016.
The Guidance applies to all FMCSA enforcement personnel who perform inspections of motor carriers and drivers in the U.S. and directs them to conduct an assessment that consists of (1) a driver interview; and (2) a highway traffic sign recognition assessment, if the inspector determines the driver may not understand the inspector’s initial instructions. At the first Step, the driver interview should be conducted in English without the use of interpretation tools. If the driver is unable to respond sufficiently to English inquiries, FMCSA’s policy is to cite the driver for a violation of the ELP regulation and there is no need to go to Step 2. In Step 2, the inspector is to evaluate the driver’s ability to understand the meaning of U.S. highway traffic signs.
When the driver is cited for a violation, FMCSA’s policy includes placing the driver immediately out-of-service (starting June 25, when the regulation is incorporated in the North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria) and initiating additional action to disqualify the driver from operating commercial motor vehicles when warranted. The Guidance does not indicate how a driver can remedy or cure the condition. The policy of placing drivers out-of-service or further disqualifying the driver should not apply to drivers performing operations in the U.S.-Mexico border commercial zone, but the drivers may still be cited for violations.
The Guidance is redacted and therefore the criteria for the assessment in Step 1 is very vague. Unless the FMCSA issues additional instructions, this could lead to uneven enforcement throughout the U.S.
For more information, contact Greg Feary, Tim Wiseman, Prasad Sharma, or Chris Eckhart.
News from Scopelitis is intended as a report to our clients and friends on developments affecting the transportation industry. The published material does not constitute an exhaustive legal study and should not be regarded or relied upon as individual legal advice or opinion.